The Midnight Sky

7/10

The Midnight Sky, based on the novel Good Morning, Midnight by Lily Brooks-Dalton, takes place on a post-apocalyptic Earth. Augustine (played by George Clooney who also directs), a dying scientist in the Arctic tries to contact others while a spacecraft  on a scouting mission for potentially habitable new worlds is returning without any of the crew knowing what is going on. This was decent.

Midnight Sky is half survival film (both in Arctic conditions and outer space) and character piece.  The best word to sum this all up is: interesting. I'm glad I saw it. It's definitely something different (both optimistic and pessimistic). Plus, there is one thing they've done with space that I don't think I've seen anyone do before that really sticks out. However, the dialogue could've been stronger. This is one of those films that felt it could've been polished a little more.  

Clooney does a decent job of directing. I particularly applaud how he handled the final scene. However, every once in a while there is a decision that took me out of the film.

A good sum of money went into this production, but not a huge amount. The computer graphics for the spaceship don't feel real enough. However, it is a really distinctive design, both inside inside and out. I also think the scenes out in the Arctic look really good and desolate in a strangely beautiful way. 

The cast is good. I didn't think David Oyelow got enough to do and say as the ship's captain, but he has this wordless scene where he absolutely kills. Also, I've got to say: Clooney really rocks an old man beard.

Overall, I recommend this. It's the sort of movie you may want to watch if you want to go with something philosophical.

Doctor Who: Revolution of the Daleks (Special)

8/10

This New Years special has the Doctor (played by Jodie Whittaker) stuck in space prison. Meanwhile, people on Earth are trying to control Dalek technology with naturally dark results. This was a fun episode.  

Yeah, this is an average Dalek story, and yeah, they are overexposed, but I felt it was well executed enough with a strong ending. It had more of an older seasons DW feel, combining humor, adventure, and a little horror. 

There was a lot going on in this, I mean it in a good way; kept things varied. The longer running time allowed more time for the cast members, including the Doctor, to have emotional moments, some of the best of the 13th Doctor's run. (Though Graham (Bradley Walsh), my favorite of the gang, doesn't get quite as much screentime as the others. In fairness, he got a lot of exposure these last two seasons.) 

Captain Jack Harkness (John Barrowman) is back. It's nice to see him again, and Barrowman's giving it his all, but I also felt writer and current showrunner Chris Chibnall leaned a little too hard on the humor with him. He felt slightly like a caricature. Corrupt businessman Jack Robinson (Law & Order's Chris Noth) from Arachnids in the UK is back. Though I'm still not that fond of him, he is definitely better written here.

The Daleks get a sleeker redesign here, and I'm not hating it. I prefer the rounder ones, but these aren't too shabby. 

There are a couple issues here. I felt the episode got a little nihilistic with the deaths. Yeah, there has always been death in Doctor Who, but there's a difference between death existing and being knocked over the head with it. (Also, there's one death that felt like a cheap tug at the emotions.)

Also, Chibnall never really made clear why the Doctor was in prison. That part really felt like a waste. 

Overall, I recommend this. Yeah, it's a formula episode, but there is a reason the formula works.

We can be Heroes

 

8/10

We can be Heroes is the newest kids film from Robert Rodriguez and a spin-off to his 2005 entry The Adventures of Sharkboy and Lavagirl 3-D. (One of the main characters is SB and LG's daughter Guppy (played by Vivien Lyra Blair)). In it, the world's biggest superheroes are captured by aliens and their children, most of which have powers of their own, go to rescue them. I felt this was good for what it is.

Rodriguez is known for his very specific style of kids film. He's doing these specifically for children (I hear he's gotten ideas and input from his own kids) with no worries about "real world rules" or adding stuff for adults. They're mostly just goofy fun. Sometimes I think these movies work, like Spy Kids and SK 4-D, and sometimes the plots are so thin that they don't, like SK 2 & 3-D. I'm happy to say that this is one that works. It's got a tight and clear and story that knows where it is going and what it is trying to say. In fact, I think it's much better than Sharkboy and Lava Girl, which threw too many things at the fan.

The kid heroes work better than the SB & LG characters as well. They all have clear personalities and fun powers. (My favorite was the "big diva musical performance" lover A Cappella (Lotus Blossom)). Though there are eleven of them, their screentime and characterization is balanced surprisingly well. I mean, there's no deep character development; this isn't one of those type of films. The kid actors all did a good job. Blair, the youngest, does feel like she's reading lines from a cue card but she's pretty good with the nonverbal stuff. 

I meant it when I said this was a spin-off and not a sequel to SB & LG. Sharkboy (JJ Dashnaw replacing Taylor Lautner) and Lavagirl (Taylor Dooley) aren't in this very much as are the rest of the parents. (Yeah, I don't know why they don't rename themselves Sharkman and Lavawoman. I mean they're still in their twenties but sooner or later the names won't match the appearances). The characters aren't given much room to breathe, but all the actors are having fun. There are a couple of refreshingly surprising known names here that I won't spoil if you don't know yet. 

Overall, this isn't high art, but it serves its purpose: entertaining kids. Both my nephews really liked this and watched it more than once. If you generally like Rodriguez's kids films or like some but not all of them then this is worth taking a chance. If you straight up get nothing from these than, yeah there's nothing to change your mind here. The director's staying the course. 

Wonder Woman 1984

 

8/10

Wonder Woman 1984, which surprise, surprise takes place in '84, has Diana Prince/Wonder Woman (played by Gal Gadot), finds herself miraculously reunited with the love of her life Steve Trevor (Chris Pine). But, what caused this and other people's wishes to be granted? The answer will propel WW on a mission to save the world. I had a fun time with this. 

The reception online has been VERY bipolar. I can understand those who had issues. The outfit WW wears in this is really shoehorned in, the villain The Cheetah (played by SNL's/Bridesmaids' Kristen Wiig) is given a great beginning and build up but a lousy conclusion and final battle (see more on that later), the manner with which Steve comes back is "problematic" and raises icky questions, there are, perhaps, one too many wishes which stretch out this two hour, thirty-one minute film, and the lighter-hearted and, at times, goofier tone does not match with that of the previous film. 

That all having been said, I came in expecting to be entertained and this delivered. I know I'm not the first person online to make this comparison, but it feels a lot like the original Superman quadrilogy/Supergirl movie. Wonder Woman 1984 is lighthearted, even more so than some Marvel movies. It's trying to just be a pleasurable viewing experience without a focus on a kill count and emphasis on the hero actually saving people.

The wishes gone wrong idea isn't new (mostly relegated to horror), but you've got to admit that they haven't done it in the superhero format. Though the movie does lean a little too heavy on the concept, I do admire the various ways the film takes advantage of the wishes and how out of control some of them get. Antagonist Maxwell Lord (The Mandalorian's Pedro Pascal) actually does some really smart things with them that you haven't seen before.

A strength of this is the four main characters. Gal Gadot once again does a great job as Diana and continues to cement the character as the more passionate superhero. Pine again works well off her. However, I missed the more serious earnestness he had in the last film. Here, he's fed more jokes. 

Cheetah's backstory of a scientist who's disrespected and put upon by society has been done several times already and feels pretty obvious. However, her descent into evil is executed really well and Wiig does a very good job. But, like I said, there wasn't enough payoff. Her full supervillain form didn't jive with me design-wise. The computer graphics weren't the best and the final battle has her move so quickly that you barely get to make her out. Pascal is fun as the main villain Lord. His trajectory is the opposite of Cheetah's. He starts off small but gets more interesting as the story progresses. He's also a change of pace as he's more of an amoral business-guy type who's just trying to grab what he can get unlike someone actively evil. (Admittedly fans of that "big" dark Wonder Woman storyline with ML might be disappointed with how light they went with him here.)

The movie looks nice; it's definitely the most colorful and brightly shot of the DCEU films. The music is excellent.

Overall, the first Wonder Woman movie is definitely the superior film. However, I personally don't think WW84 is a fail. It provides a different viewing experience than other superhero films and is a good time-filler.

Soul

 

10/10

The newest Pixar movie Soul, out on Disney+ and without the $30 charge Mulan had, is about Joe (voiced by Jaimie Foxx), a music teacher whose dream is to become a professional jazz pianist. When he finally gets his big break, he accidentally falls down a manhole and becomes a soul in the afterlife. In my opinion, this is one of the best movies the studio has ever made and that's saying something.

This movie was co-directed by Pete Docter, who was also responsible for Inside Out, and like that film it is surprisingly philosophical and introspective, even more so. This movie looks at what a person's purpose in life is and what drives them. Yet, it is all wrapped up in an entertaining audience-friendly story with a decent cast.

Tina Fey does a good job as the other lead 22, a pre-born soul who isn't interested in becoming alive, but it's Foxx who is the heart and, pun not intended, soul of the movie. He just brings such life to Joe and his hopes and dreams. 

Color me impressed with the sheer amount of creativity put into the appearance of the nonphysical realm. A lot of this truly feels otherworldly, including an emphasis on the blue/purple color scheme that you don't see in other films. And the designs for the beings in charge of this world are equally distinct, going a two-dimensional liney/UPA style. Also, I loved the detail of the textures in the real world. The walls of Joe's classroom looked practically real to me.

If there is any issue with this, it's that this is more likely to entertain adults than the child target audience. The whole film is very talky, plot heavy, and mature in its message. I watched this with my nephews and they both lost interest. (One could also argue that Joe's  difference of opinion with his mom (Phylicia Rashad) who wants him to stop chasing his dream and get a steady job is a little formulaic, but it's handled well.)

Overall, this is highly recommended. This is just one of those rare films that is truly excellent. 

The Mandalorian- Season 2

10/10

In season 2, The Mandalorian (played by Pedro Pascal) continues his quest to bring The Child to the Jedi. This was as good as the first one.

This continues to be an excellent  show with almost cinema-quality appearance and entertaining action, stories, and characters. I appreciate that whereas the first season was sort of one big long tease that didn't answer any of its mysteries or questions, this one is payoff city. Plus, fans will be pleased to see a lot more fan service to the wider Star Wars universe here. But, it doesn't feel shoved in or pulls you out of the story. If you're unfamiliar with various characters or references from the various movies or animated television programs, don't worry. The show manages to introduce them without expecting you to be already familiar. The story is from the Mandalorian's viewpoint, and he's new to much of the people and places he's visited. 

Again, the show consists of stand-alone episodes, but there is a stronger connecting thread between them this time around. There is a greater emphasis on the supporting players. 

The one weak spot here, the same as before, is that this show's homage to westerns and samurai films can at times be a little too obvious. 

Highly recommended. This was another round of great storytelling.   

The Holiday Movies That Made US

 

8/10

This spin-off of The Movies That Made Us, which itself was a spin-off of The Toys That Made Us. looks at the creation of the Christmas films Elf and The Nightmare Before Christmas (sorry, no Christmas Story or Muppets Christmas Carol). It's only two episodes. I wouldn't be surprised if this was a four episode order that got split into two seasons and we'll see the second one around Halloween. 

I liked this. Like MTMU, this provides some interesting factoids about the films, including struggles to get them made, all packaged in a well paced and fun format. 

Just be forewarned, that this doesn't snag a lot of the big names, such as Will Ferrell, Tim Burton, or John Favreau, but we still get a lot of faces behind the films' creation. Also, you do get a heap of Oingo Boingo's Danny Elfman, so there's that. 

Overall, if you liked the previous shows, I think you'll like this.