Barbarian

6/10

In this new horror film, Tess (played by Krypton's Georgina Campbell) books a B&B in Detroit. It is soon evident that something not right is going on at the location.

This is one of those movies where it is best to keep things vague. Barbarian does a wonderful job of keeping you guessing about what's going on and surprising you. There are some pretty bold, scary moments not to mention the general uncomfortableness you feel from trying the messed up clues the characters find. You also get a good cast and some pretty good set design/scenery.

If you're the person who likes some horror but have limits to what content you'll watch, be forewarned that this gets messed up.

However, despite some real horror highs in this, I'm not rating this higher because this is also one of the greatest examples of one of horror film's greatest weaknesses: terrible/arbitrary character decisions. The trailer may make you think Tess is immediately thrown into her situation, but NO, she has plenty of time to get out of Dodge. Common sense is often thrown out the window. The dialogue for those situations can be fairly bad at points too (though there is some great strong dialogue in this as well.) Not to mention that there are some big logistical plot holes. This is also like American Horror Story in that once all is revealed the movie loses some glamour as the answer to the mystery simply isn't as interesting or original as what your imagination could concoct.

This is the sort of movie where people's mileage will vary considerably. Some people will love the stuff in this that does work, but others won't be able to see past the flaws in this.

Nope

 

8.5

In Jordan Peele's Nope, brother and sister OJ (played by Get Out's Daniel Kaaluya) and Emerald Haywood (Keke Palmer) try to get clear footage of a UFO hanging around their family ranch.

This was a really unique, well made film. There is a lot you don't see in the trailer. It gets pretty interesting. It has Peele trying to send a message, but adds enough humor and action that the movie doesn't alienate the casual viewer. (Though don't get me wrong, the movie is kinda pretentious.)

Peele does an excellent job with visuals. This movie has three of the most unsettling/scary images I've ever seen. And let me make this clear that due to having been desensitized by seeing a ton of horror films and neurological stuff going on I rarely ever scare. Haven't been frightened by a film for a decade. The fact that there are three moments that generally got to me is saying something. On the non-scary side of the visuals, I really liked the look of Jupiter's Claim, the small western-themed amusement park located near the ranch. Looks like a place you'd like to visit.

Great cast in this. Kaaluya does a great job bringing to life OJ, a guy who knows the business of training horses like few others but is socially awkward (may be on the spectrum). However, Keke as Emerald, the opposite of her brother, great with people but irresponsible, steals the movie. She brings such energy to the role. Having seen her in a few other things, I'm happy she's finally landed such a high profile role. Honestly, I'm surprised it hadn't happened sooner. She's generally good in whatever she does. Also, props should be given to The OA's Angel Torres, who's fun as a guy without much going who joins the UFO hunting crew and is a source of humor and kinda the voice of common sense, and Michael Wincott (the villain from The Crow) as an eccentric cinematographer/director? (couldn't figure exactly what his job was.) Also if you're a fan of Keith David and heard he was in this one, his appearances are very brief. Such a waste of such a distinctive voice.

As much as I thought this was an impressive film, I couldn't go with a full 9 or 10/10. Usually I have very specific cons for a film. But, here it's hard to pinpoint why I couldn't give this a 90/100%. (Unlike a lot of people talking about this movie, I have no major complaints about the subplot.) Maybe it's the fact that there are a couple moments where Peele insists a little too hard on trying to be clever or the audience having to put things together themselves. Maybe it's the general vibe of the storytelling (Peele's films can feel like a very distinct and different world like those of Tarantino and Shyamalan.) Or maybe, it's that Peele was a little crueler in points than necessary. Yeah, it's a horror film and they're usually about horrible things happening to people, but sometimes, like in Nightmare on Elm Street 5 and Alien vs. Predator: Requiem, a horror movie's writers may be more interested in twisting the knife on a character than actually being scary. There are a couple small parts where I felt Peele did that a little.

Naturally, I can't recommend this to people who scare easily as this is nightmare fuel. I CAN recommend this to everyone else. This really is something that'll leave an impression.

Studio 666

6/10

In this horror comedy starring the Foo Fighters and from an original story by frontman Dave Grohl, the band go to a mansion with, surprise, surprise, a dark history to work on their new album.  

This feels like a passion project from Grohl & co. The majority of them aren't great actors (especially Pat Smear) but they do bring a genuine enthusiasm to their roles and felt like they were trying their best. It does help that the lead is Grohl, who is the best actor of the group and his comic delivery ain't half bad.  

Humor-wise there are some genuinely funny parts. However, the jokes are pretty hit-and-miss. A lot of the good material is in the first half. 

Horror-wise, I was pleased with the violence and visuals. This obviously didn't have a high budget, but I wouldn't call it low, low either. Things don't look perfect, but I think you'll be satisfied with the ambition and amount of effects. Gore hounds will love the violence. If you like straight-up horror iconography and none of that artsy atmospheric or keep-it-vague-and-to-the-imagination stuff, then this is up your alley. There are some pretty nice supernatural visuals here; really feels like 80's album cover art sometimes.

Unfortunately, this movie feels a little amateurish. A lot of stuff feels directionless. The final act just goes on and on. Some of the editing and camera work  could've been better, which is weird considering that director BJ McDonnell has a long history as a camera operator, but I guess camera work's not the same as editing shots.

I wouldn't call this a must-see or must-avoid. A lot of people will probably get bored by this. But, Foo Fighter and gore and horror comedy fans may get more fun out of this than others. 

Resident Evil: Welcome to Raccoon City

6/10

In this new reboot for the Resident Evil franchise based on the first and second video games, a group of people become trapped in Raccoon City (which I'm not sure is actually a city; feels more like a large town; kinda isolated) when there is a zombie outbreak. 

This movie can both be entertaining and frustrating. The horror is solid. There's a lot of freaky, memorable imagery. Interesting use of color in this; makes you feel like you're watching a 70's scary movie. The original RE films got criticism over the years for drifting so much from the original look and feel of the video games. This one really tried veer closer. Loved some of the sets in this. It has that sort of grandiose gothicness that doesn't really exist in American architecture and that you'd only find in Japanese video games. I also like the northern forest area, brings a secluded look to the area separating the town. (Also, I just like pine trees in films. I think they make nice scenery.) 

But as creepy and good looking as the movie is, the script is really weak. The first act exposition and dialogue is pretty clunky. The whole backstory for the leads siblings Claire and Chris Redfield (Kaya Scodelario and Robbie Amell) and the villain's choices feel really mishandled, and I really wish they went with something completely different. Going back to the dialogue, it's nothing to be proud of, but in fairness there are a couple fun lines when the movie isn't taking itself too seriously.

I recommend this to horror fans, because the scary stuff really delivers. I would've considered this an 8/10 if it wasn't for that pesky script. Just make sure to temper your expectations.

Scream (2022)

8/10

In this fifth entry in the film series, but with the same name as the first, a new group of teens become targets of yet another Ghostface killer. 

Pretty clever, solid and entertaining script with a lot of funny lines. There a couple surprises. Not since the first film and its meta look at its own genre of horror movies, has a Scream film has such solid things to say about movies. This is a fairly entertaining commentary on requels/soft reboots (the movie itself), franchise fatigue, and fandom. The movie's also self-aware of how the slasher and basic violence-based horror is a dying breed in a world where elevated horror (psychological or social commentary) currently reigns.   

The attacks and kills in this can get pretty brutal. Although the big finale is appropriately violent as is the course with these movies, it does lack a certain oomph that you found in 1, 2, and 4. (I rightfully can't remember 3's ending much. It's been years since I've seen it and I can't go back. I tried once, but it's so unwatchable.) Though I like this movie, I admit that the choreography and cinematography can't match what Wes Craven brought to the first and second Screams.     

Liked the new cast. Unlike the last film, which balanced the new group of teens and the franchise's main trio, I felt this one took the wiser route and focused more on the new faces that may help carry the franchise onward allowing us to get to know them more. To be honest, Sidney Prescott's story feels played out and you can only do so much with her after a while, not to mention Gale and Dewey. Remember how their last subplot was a dull and unnecessary difference of opinions? By focusing on new lead Sam Carpenter (played by Melissa Barrera), I became invested in her. Of the new cast, I'd say the best would have to be Mindy Meeks-Martin (Jasmin Savoy Brown) and Sam's boyfriend Richie Kirsch (Jack Quaid). Mindy is the new horror movie expert and she is able to differentiate herself from her predecessors in that role in by having a personality that's a little too chill and laid back with all the horrible things going on. Richie is just funny; he has some of the best lines and delivery here. That having been said, of the original trio, Dewey (David Arquette) definitely has the best material to work with. The once amateurish deputy has developed into a sorta grizzled, hardened veteran by this point. 

I'd rate this below 1 and 2 and above 4 and 3. (To be clear, I'm a fan of 4 and this didn't beat it by much.) Recommended. I can't say it as good as the original or quite have the magic brought Wes Craven and Kevin Williamson, but it's another good entry in a franchise that's been surprisingly solid for the most part.  

Last Night in Soho

 

7.5/10

In Last Night in Soho, fresh new design school student Eloise (Thomasin McKenzie) rents an apartment in London. Soon she begins to dream about Sandie (Queen's Gambit's Anna Taylor-Joy) a woman from the 60's, Eloise's favorite time period. Though she is initially fascinated with Sandie's life, things soon get darker and dangerous. The movie's got two decent acts followed by a final one that knocks it out of the park. 

LNiS is competently run throughout. It's directed by Edgar Wright and he knows how to bring in the style. The 60's London and paranormal stuff are shot so well, including an excellent use of lighting and colors and just the setup of the dream/ghostly stuff. There are a few scary/action scenes in this that are some of the best looking of the year. The basic messages of the plot, the importance of mental health and how women can be preyed upon by men, are both well handled. (In fact, the latter concept is a great example of how the second Black Christmas should have been handled. It's able to address the message of women's exploitation by men in a way that's done naturally while also telling a good story).   

However, the first two acts may be kinda a drudge for many viewers' taste. I wouldn't say any scene is too slow or boring, but there is a lot of exposition and set up. I could predict where things are going way ahead of time, and then it became the burden of waiting to see things happen. It doesn't help that mean Eloise's fellow fashion student Jocasta (Synnove Karlsen) and her clique are too one dimensional and cliched and Eloise's love interest John (Michael Ajao) feels pretty underdeveloped. 

My issues with the film disappear with the third act. I mean it completely wowed me. It's no longer predictable. Pacing, suspense, and the visuals run at 11/10. Admittedly there is one big plot hole at the end, but I didn't consider it a deal breaker. 

Great casting in this. McKenzie does a very good job playing a character going through a gamut of emotions. We get a couple solid performances from some experienced actors. Terence Stamp plays a man connected to the dreams. From what I've seen at least in his American films, he often plays serious characters, so it's nice to see him play someone more lively: a clever sort whose presence automatically makes the watcher uncomfortable. The late Diana Rigg in what is her last film shines in a smaller role as Eloise's old-fashioned, no-nonsense neighbor.   

Wonderful soundtrack, featuring multiple classic 60's hits.

Overall, I think this is worth watching. It definitely could've been improved but comes from a good place, and when it impresses it impresses. Really nails the classic supernatural thriller formula.

Malignant

 

6.5/10

In Malignant, Madison Mitchell (played by The Mummy (2017)/Annabelle's Annabelle Wallis) keeps having visions of people being killed by the mysterious Gabriel.

This movie is a mix of good  and bad stuff. First the bad. Dialogue is pretty weak, attempts at serious moments can be silly, attempts at humor can fall flat (though in fairness there's a  good line here and there), and there are a couple moments where stuff needs to happen regardless of the real world logic. At least it's dumb in a "the filmmakers were trying to have fun" sort of way and not a "trying too hard to be serious or dark" sort of way which can be a far more painful viewing experience.

However, the movie has a lot of things I really dug. There are a lot of moments where things go bonkers in a good way. There are reveals you don't see coming and more importantly there is Gabriel. The trailers make him look like your traditional specter/demon haunting someone type, but that's not the case here and he's so much more. Gabriel's one of the more unique horror movie killers I've seen in a while. I want to keep things vague, but he has a very 80's feel to him like he was meant to sell toys. 

Director James Wan is known for his visual, cinematic horror and he doesn't disappoint here. Unlike many of his other movies, there isn't as much emphasis creepy atmosphere, but he makes up for it with some truly impressive kills and fight-the-villain scenes. There's a chase scene in this that is simply one of the best thing's he's ever shot. His choice of sets also work; there are certain buildings that build a larger-than-life feel and also evoke the 80's.

The cast isn't able to make the weak dialogue work. However, I wouldn't say anyone here is a bad actor either.

This is hard to recommend or not. I think that many people will love the Gabriel stuff enough that it'll make up for the bad stuff. But, Gabriel may be too much for some people (like I said, this movie gets nuts) or won't be enough to make up going through the bad dialogue and less interesting points. If anything, I think this movie will definitely leave an impression on you.

Candyman (2021)

9/10

In this sequel to the original Candyman that has the exact same name (it's the Thing prequel all over again; just add a subtitle to tell them apart!), Anthony McCoy (played by Aquaman's Yahya Abdul-Mateen II), suffering from artist's block, turns to the urban legend of the Candyman for creativity, which leads him down a dark, deadly path.

First off, the scares and violence in this are really, really well done. There are clever and brutal ideas in this. There's a scene where I had to avert my eyes, and that doesn't happen much. Some of the best "slashing" kills I've ever seen put to screen are here. 

The camerawork is wonderful (including one kill you won't forget). There is a lot of use of mirrors and reflections and it never gets old. Has wonderful sets and locations, especially in the nicer part of Chicago. Some unique architecture choices are used to create a feeling of cold, urban uneasiness. 

Paper shadow puppets are used for the exhibition of the Candyman's history and they have their own creepy simplicity to them. Hats off to both the opening and closing credits and the musical choices for them. (Think about the opening to Us; they share that particular unsettling feel.) Also just kudos for doing an opening credits at all; you don't see those much anymore. We even get a rework of the music box/Helen's theme from the original that has its own special take.

The movie has a clever and surprisingly acceptable way of dealing with the fact that original Candyman Tony Todd is too old looking to play the unaging character. This new idea also comes up with a decent explanation for why he's called Candyman, which was never explained in the original. The film does all this, while managing to maintain continuity.

Whereas the original was a white director's views of the black experience, this movie is a direct source of the Black voice with both an African American director and screenwriters, including Jordan Peele. The film addresses such topics as gentrification and the treatment of the Black man in American history. 

The script has a few funny moments that manage not to feel out of place or betray the horror of the film.

As much as I was shocked by the movie or interested in what happened next, the story could've been tighter in a couple places. There are twp short character moments I think could've been cut as they didn't quite work. There are also a couple scenes that I felt needed to be handled in a more nuanced manner.

Fans of Tony Todd don't come into this expecting to see him. It's too bad, because the threat or threats in this don't have the gravitas Todd possessed and made the character famous. 

Cast in this pretty is good, especially Abdul-Mateen. He does a great job of playing a three-dimensional character that becomes selfish and self-destructive, but you still care about what happens to him.

I still prefer the original. It had a tighter script and more of a unique raw, bleak feel to it. This doesn't miss by that much, though. It still brings a bleak, urban eeriness to everything while also having it's own feel. The movie definitely leaves more of an impression than a lot of horror movies. Recommended, especially for kill fans. 

The Night House

6.5/10

In The Night House, Beth (played by Godzilla vs. Kong/Iron Man 3's Rebecca Hall) is dealing with her husband's death, and soon weird, creepy stuff starts happening at their house.

This is one of those movies that is competently made but is unable to quite make the landing. The basic gist of the story is fairly good. I appreciate that this movie looks like it's doing something that has been done before in other films but manages to shake things up a bit. The third act really works and the ending leaves an impression. Plus, there is some really next-level haunting imagery, some of the best I've seen in a while. 

Buuuuuutttt... The first two acts are too slow. This is an hour and forty-eight minutes, but feels a lot longer. Much of this is Beth investigating her husband and the house and occasionally discussing things with others. These sort of investigative-type movies can work (What Lies Beneath being a good example), but they have to be paced well or at least do things in an attention-keeping manner. This lacks that. There are also moments where the dialogue doesn't feel natural. I know Beth is suffering from grief, pain, and depression, but man does the script make her MEGA touchy and combative at times. Though, I got to give Rebecca Hall credit: she does a good job of making the character work and elevating the dialogue.

In fact, the whole cast does a surprisingly good job with what they had to work with. The best performance may be Chicago Hope's Vondie Curtis-Hall as a concerned neighbor of Beth.

This is not a must-see, but the when the movie works, it really works and like I said there's some great imagery in this. I can see some people getting a higher mileage out of this than I.

Fear Street: Part One, 1994

8/10

Nowadays, R.L. Stine's name is synonymous with the children's horror series Goosebumps, which has been a dominant force in the industry for some decades. Though this is Stine's biggest hit, this isn't his first success. Before Goosebumps, he wrote the teen-focused horror series Fear Street. Though it didn't have the literary longevity of Goosebumps, FS was big during the nineties. Given Stine's fame after Goosebumps, I'm actually surprised it's taken this long for television or film to capitalize on his other brand.

Fear Street Part One on Netflix, is an interesting venture. It's the first in a film trilogy whose installments are all released in the same month. The format kind of makes sense considering that Fear Street would occasionally have trilogy subseries. In the movie, Deena (played by Kiana Madeira) is a teen in the town of Shadyside who runs afoul of the deadly curse that plagues it.

This movie goes for sort of a classic 80's/90's horror feel and I rather like it. For fans of horror violence, there are a couple of truly violent kills, including one particularly creative one. 

I was rather satisfied with the killer or killers. (I'll keep things vague since the trailer doesn't say much.)

On the other hand, the movie suffers from too much teen drama. I just feel that movies are overdoing it on the youths having hard times. I'm here to watch people run away from murderers. That's what I want. Plus, the movie suffers from a rival school that is super mean for absolutely no reason. Shadyside is supposed to be the "loser/ill-fated" town, and the movie leans on people mentioning this way too hard. Luckily, the worst of this in only the setup. The self-loathing subsides once the real threat starts.

All the actors playing the teens are of legal age, but are mostly pretty young and could pass for actual high schoolers. Their appearance makes things uncomfortable. The movie does not shy away from sexuality and the stripping of clothing. It looks like the underage are doing these acts.

The score has an old-school and overtly-dramatic score. Feels a little dated, but the music is strong.

Can't say this is the most memorable slasher ever made, but it's nice to have one of these these days and makes for a fine time waster.

Escape Room: Tournament of Champions

 

6/10

In this sequel to Escape Room, the evil Minos Corporation has again kidnapped Zoey Davis (Taylor Russell) as well as other survivors of their deadly, and delightfully unbelievable, escape rooms to once again compete.

The movie does deliver what it promises when it comes to the death traps. If that's only what you came for, you should be pleased. It's another creative array of truly harrowing and detailed death games. The production crew definitely earned their pay on building these sets. That having been said, I personally think the first movie's death traps stood out more, with the beach trap being the only super visually memorable one in this. They're making the mind games a little complicated here, so it can be hard to follow and I think that one of the traps near the end was too nasty for it's own good. But my complaints aside. I mostly liked the deadly rooms here; I'm just saying the first ones beat them in a contest.  

I'm liking the new victims in this. Good cast with distinctive personalities.

The plot is why I'm not ranking this higher. First off there is one major plot hole that is pretty clear from the start. Minos does something that doesn't match up with how it operated in the last film. In fact, one of the characters bring that up. However, the writers never bother giving an actual answer for why for the lack of consistency. That issue alone probably wouldn't have been that big a deal, but in the third act the story just falls apart. I know that a movie about a secret cabal operating death games for betting and amusement isn't really a grounded idea, but the script gets nonsensical and needlessly complicated. Really disappointed in the ending. Sure, the last film went out of it's way to set up the next film, but it did end mostly on a reasonable and satisfying note. This finale left me empty.    

If you just want to see the death traps, you'll be fine. But if you don't like it when horror movies do really dumb or unnatural things, there's a good chance you'll be turned off by this.

Werewolves Within

8/10

In the horror comedy Werewolves Withing, loosely based on the video game of the same name, the residents of the small isolated town of Beaverfield find themselves cut off from the outside world and the possible prey of a werewolf.

I found this to be a rather fun, quirky, and clever film. There are a good few twists and turns in this. I kind of like the idea of a werewolf film that operates more like a murder mystery. (Anyone remember 1974's The Beast Must Die? It's sort of in that vein but a comedy.) Kind of wish we had more of these. Good use is made of the growing suspicion and paranoia amongst the suspects.  

Some may find the townspeople to be a little over the top. Nor can I say that the characters or every line of dialogue are necessarily amongst the top tier of comedy (like in Clue). However, the cast really delivers. The lines come fast, and you get plenty of good bits. Basically, it's an appreciate the sum-of-the-whole rather than the details situation. 

The leads, Veep's Sam Richardson as the new park ranger, and the AT&T girl Milana Vayntraub as a postal worker, are what really make the movie. They work really together and make a great duo. Vayntraub brings a quirky energy. Richardson is the MVP. He plays the well-meaning guy who's doing his best to stay keep things together. Richardson knows the perfect delivery for every line.

This is directed by College Humor alumni Josh Ruben who also directed the horror comedy thriller Scare Me. I think he'll be one to watch. There's a couple interesting camera shots that remain focused on one person or angle that work rather well. The song selection for this is also rather interesting and helps set the mood (especially the first song.)

Recommended. I mentioned some quibbles, but I really did enjoy myself. 

Army of the Dead

8/10

Zach Snyder's first post-DCU film goes back to his roots. The movie that started his career was the Dawn of the Dead remake and after all these years he's back to zombies. In Army of the dead, the entirety of Las Vegas was quarantined and blocked off after a zombie outbreak. A typically ragtag group led by former soldier Scott Ward (Dave Bautista) is organized to retrieve a whole lot of money from a casino vault before the government blows the place up.  

There's been a lot of zombie movies over the years, and Snyder seems to realize that. He tries to tackle some new things with zombies (he definitely has the budget to), smart zombies and zombie animals. 

Movie looks good. The intro montage showing the start of the zombie attack is really impressive and the best planned part of the movie. Since this takes place out in the heat of Nevada, Snyder actually uses sunlight in his film, though it is still muted somewhat as is the director's wont. The zombie fighting is well done. It's especially fun to see the massive Bautista take down zombies with just a knife.

You get a sizable number of distinctive characters in this. The one who stands out the most is safe-cracker and comic relief Dieter (Matthias Schewighofer).

There are a lot of plot points you can question about this, especially the whole plan for the heist, but they weren't severe enough that they interrupted my just enjoying the film.

One thing that bugged me is that ending goes on a little too long past a good stopping point. It's not as long as Snyder's infamous epilogue to Justice League, but it feels inelegant. 

Overall, Army of the Dead is a pretty entertaining zombie action flick. Nothing more, nothing less. Recommended.

The Conjuring, the Devil Made Me Do It

 

8/10

In this third entry in the main Conjuring line of films, Lorraine and Ed Warren (played by Vera Farmiga and Patrick Wilson) investigate the possession of Arne Cheyenne Johnson (Ruairi O'Connor) who was made to commit a murder.

First, off this didn't have the same steady rate of scares as the first two films. There are decent ones, don't get me wrong, but they're spread apart. I didn't really mind as The Devil Makes Me Do It has an entertaining story. The movie moves away from focusing on one family being haunted (although I liked Conjuring 2, I admit it the plot did feel a little retread-ey) and is more of a supernatural investigation movie. Instead of constant scare there is a little more of an emphasis of general dark underpinnings.

This is the first time in the main films you actually see kills if that's what you like. However, one may also feel it gross to make a popcorn film based on a real manslaughter case.        

One of the best parts is just hanging with the Warrens. Between their dialogue and Farmiga and Wilson's performance, the characters are just plain likable. (Credit should especially be given to Farmiga. She really sells her reactions to the supernatural.) I could watch them ordering breakfast at Denny's and I'd be fine. The rest of the cast is good, too. 

What I like about the Conjuring sequels is that they always tweak a little what the main threat will be. The antagonist in this may not be quite the standout that Conjuring 2's The Nun was, but is fairly effective and he or she leaves more of an impression than the ghost from the first film.

The movie's just nice to look at. This was directed by Michael Chaves, who direct the Conjuring-verse's La Llorona. That was my second least favorite film in the franchise, and I must admit I had my reservations about the director. I'm happy to say that Chaves has really improved. He really has a confident control of the cinematography. This movie reverts to the first Conjuring's  lighting scheme, and shows you can have natural, sunny lighting and still be a horror film. Chaves also has a really good eye for scenery and set design.

The scary moments may not be as frequent or have the punch that of the Conjuring, but don't get me wrong there are some good ones, some of which maintain the style of the previous films. 

Overall, I'd recommend this. Again, not quite as strong as the last two films but that's just compared to them. Besides, they were directed by James Wan, one of the biggest horror directors of recent. It's a bit of an unfair comparison. It's just a good time if you like spooky stuff.

Spiral

 

8/10

Spiral, the ninth movie in the Saw franchise and basically a second attempt to restart it after Jigsaw (the film, not the person) didn't take off. In it it, yet ANOTHER Jigsaw (the person, not the film) copycat killer (how many have there been by now?) is targeting crooked cops. 

I've never been a big Saw/torture porn fan. I've only seen parts of the first two films. However, I was curious about this. Comedian Chris Rock personally wanted to do a Saw movie, and this went more plot heavy instead of mostly following a person or persons navigating the traps. 

Rock as Detective Zeke Banks is probably my favorite part of this. He just does a good job as the jaded/partially-on-the-edge cop. Max Minghella is likable as Banks' fresh-eyed new partner William Schenk. The two actors both have great chemistry. Admittedly, they play basic cop tropes, but they were entertaining enough that I didn't care. However, there was something off about the police captain Angie Garza (Marisol Nichols). She felt like she was from an entirely different style of production, like a network television procedural.

The plot is interesting. There's a big mystery as to why these specific cops were targeted. It's not the most ambitious story, but it works. Effort is given to develop Banks' past and how it correlates to the mystery at hand. There is a surprising amount of humor in this.

On the other hand, there are some plot points that don't quite work when you think about it. A couple of characters you expect to go somewhere really don't. (In fairness, I've read that one kill got cut.) While the ending works for me, it is a bit abrupt for my taste. Though in fairness, the Saw movies aren't known for wrapping things up with "where they are now."

Some fans of the franchise may not like that the killer skews a bit from the typical Jigsaw killer formula. This one doesn't have a twisted need to make people appreciate their lives and isn't so much a sportsman. Still, I don't know if anyone really filled the shoes of the original Jigsaw, so it makes sense to have this new guy or gal have some wriggle room to forge their own identity.

This is directed by Darren Lynn Bousman who directed entries two through four, and he brings a sense of style. This takes place during a heat wave and the use of a harsh orange/yellow lighting scheme sells this.

Of course you're probably wondering about the bread and butter of the Saw franchise: the traps. I'll be honest. Not a fan. Too much for my taste. However if you're a fan of the traps and gore, this really cranks things up to 11. 

Overall, if you like the Saw movies, I recommend this. If you liked the first movie but were disappointed how the later films focused more on traps and violence than the story, then this might be a nice return to form for you. But yeah... If you don't like torture porn, you should definitely avoid. It gets nasty.

Nobody Sleeps in the Woods Tonight

7/10

This is a Polish homage (originally titled W lesie dziś nie zaśnie nikt) to classic slasher films. In it, a group of teens at a technology/social media detoxification camp go on a camping trip where they encounter a dangerous killer. This was decent. 

Admittedly, This doesn't do a lot to differentiate itself from other slasher films, but it is a competently handled film. Like I said, this this is an homage. I read that the director Bartosz M. Kowalski created this movie because Poland never had a slasher film. Here, he's created a shrine to the basic tenets of the horror subgenre.

The movie has a sense of humor about itself, particularly the first half. There are a couple good bits. However, this isn't a full comedy. The second half gets dark. When things get violent, things get VIOLENT. Gore hounds will have a lot of fun with this; there are some very creative kills.  

The murderer design is delightfully grotesque. It's partially humorous, being a type that feels like it's parodying 80's horror. (Though this might possibly be due to a low budget than the director's intent.) But, the design is also unsettling as you see it in action as the killer does terrible things. (Sort of like if you saw a Garbage Pail Kid come to life and killing people.)  

Though I found this fun, the movie could've been stronger. The second half feels stretched out. The movie also gives all the teen protagonists backstories and personal struggles. Unfortunately, all of them feel like tropes that have been done before. This should've just stuck to the killing. No one is watching this type of movie for character-driven story. (This isn't Stephen King.)     

I recommend this. Though not great, it's interesting.

Come Play

 

7/10

In Come Play, based on a short film from a couple years back, autistic child Oliver (Azhy Robertson) becomes the target of a monster named Larry who wants him to be his friend... forever! Bum, bum, bum! But yeah, it's decent.

The biggest strength here is that the movie looks at what it is like to have more severe autism (Oliver barely speaks in this) and what it is like for a parent raising one. The movie does a great job making you feel for Oliver and his mother Sarah (Community's Gillian Jacobs). There is also a part with a group of bullies that could've been really predictable, but I was pleased that it went in a different direction.

Larry, who's invisible for most of the time if he isn't seen, is a fun skeletal design, though the budget on his computer animation didn't feel particularly high, so it's probably a good thing they keep him to the shadows. I like that the character gives off this dark fairy tale vibe.

Nice lighting scheme in this; it managed to be eerie without being darkly shot enough that there's no color or you can't make things out.

Acting is good, especially from Robertson. (Heck, all the child actors in this are good.) After what I thought was a disappointing performance in Magic Camp, I'm glad to say Jacobs has bounced back and is believable as a worried and stressed-out mother. 

That all having been said, this is a competently handled movie, but it didn't "wow" me that much. Too many of the scares lack something or went by too quickly to register. In general, a lot of parts of this feel too similar to other works. The dramatic/real world parts also could've been trimmed down a bit. All complaints aside, the final confrontation is pretty good with strong visuals and tension.

 I can't say this is a particularly original or standout film, but I think most horror fans will have a good time with it.

Books of Blood

 

6/10

In this anthology on Hulu based on the short story collection from Clive Barker, we get three horror stories es based around a book containing the tales of the dead. Didn't hate it, didn't love it.   

First off, if you were a fan of the original Books of Blood then be prepared to be disappointed. One of the tales is original and the others are based on the wraparounds in the first volume which had already been adapted into a film. So if you've been waiting for one of these tales to be adapted, you'll have to keep waiting. I wouldn't have minded more stories in this myself.

The Achilles heel here is the first story after the wraparound, about a college-aged woman (played by Britt Robertson) on the run from her own life who ends up renting a room from a couple that are almost too friendly. Half the short suffers from being being a little predictable in the set up. It's missing a certain "oomph." The other half of the content does get creative, and I wouldn't have predicted it. But, I found the big reveal in this to be a little too messed up for my tastes. Now if you like it when horror gets dark, dark, this'll be right up your alley. But if you like horror, but you have your limits then be forewarned. 

The wraparound, about two enforcers in search of the Book of Blood, and the other short, about a skeptical professor (Pushing Daisies' Anna Friel) investigating a man's claims that he can communicate with the dead, I rather liked. They are both nicely paced with well executed scares. The second story has a really striking ending, and Friel delivers the best performance in the film. I appreciate that this has a substantive wraparound, not a vague one like with VHS or no connections at all for the segments. More importantly, this movie has one of the strongest finales I've seen in an anthology. It's been bugging me lately how predictable these have become. (I mean you can only see the characters realize they're dead or that they've been talking to Death/the Devil only so many times.) 

I appreciate that director/screenwriter Brannon Braga and other writer Adam Simon had a clear vision and they do a very competent job with setting up and telling the story. The look of the whole thing is well done, too. However, as good as parts of this are, they weren't enough to negate how the first story left me a bit empty and was too disturbing. However, this feels like one of those movies that will be very subjective across the populace. I can see some getting a lot more out of this.

The Haunting of Bly Manor

 

9/10

The Haunting of Bly Manor on Netflix is the sequel show to The Haunting of Hill House and based on Henry James' novella The Turn of the Screw. In it, Dani Clayton (played Victoria Pedretti from the last show) is hired on as a nanny for two kids at solitary Bly Manor which has born witness to recent tragedies. Also, it's haunted, hence the title. The show has a slow start, but I ended up being so impressed at where this goes.  

First off, let me make it clear that this isn't the fright fest that Hill House was. Bly Manor has its creepy parts, but there isn't as much emphasis on the scares. This is more of a gothic tale like Crimson Peak was. The show does retain Hill House's focus on the human condition and relationships, which is its best strength. Things do start slow. I was initially going to rank this a notch lower, but when all the pieces connect and everything is revealed it is done so well. The ending becomes a gut punch of emotions. I found the payoff entirely worth it. 

The heart and soul of is the excellent character work. The cast really pulls it off. Pedretti gets more screen time and just does a really emotional job as the lead. Oliver Jackson-Cohen returns and plays a truly multifaceted role as a former employee of the manor's owner. He can be both intimidating and sympathetic. The two biggest newcomers here are T'Nia Miller and Rahul Kohli as the housekeeper and cook, who also steal their scenes.

A couple last criticisms: there is some great dialogue, but there can be a few moments where it feels too verbose and manufactured. This is especially obvious when it is done with the child actors. Now, they both do an excellent job, especially considering how difficult some of what they were required to say was. However, I think it is unfair to have expected so much from any kids. This is a backstory flashback heavy show. I did find that they all could've been skimmed down a bit. Nothing that breaks the show, I just think the pacing could've been improved.

I'd say Hill House was the stronger effort, but this show is definitely worth your time. At least try to make it to the halfway point when things start getting juicy. The show is only nine episodes long.

The Babysitter: Killer Queen

8/10

The Babysitter: Killer Queen on Netflix is a horror comedy and the sequel to 2017's original, in which a young Cole (played by Judah Lewis) finds out his babysitter Bee (Samara Weaver) is part of a Satanic cult. In this, Cole's now a teenager (the original was filmed in 2015 and the actor has grown some) and must face the resurrected members of the cult. I liked this a lot better than the first.

The first film was a mixed bag in my opinion. It felt a little all-over-the-place. This one feels a lot more streamlined and straight-to-the-point. The last movie also tried to be a coming-of-age story, which didn't gel with me. This one dumps a lot of that and focuses more on the action and comedy to its benefit. (Not to say that Cole doesn't have an arc.)

There are some creative, madcap, bloody kills in this. Returning director McG (who did the Charlie's Angels movies) brings back his distinctive visual choices. It doesn't always land but is fun when it does. The new location, a rocky area surrounding a lake, is pretty scenic and also serves as a nice treacherous location for the characters to scramble through. 

Thing is that for a movie called The Babysitter, it has very little of the actual sitter in this. Weaving's stock has risen recently, and she's had a busy schedule these last couple of years, so apparently she was available for a limited period of time. I know that there are people who feel that Bee's relationship with Cole was one if not the biggest parts of the first film, but I'm okay with this. More time for the jokes and carnage.   

On the plus side, we get the rest of what is probably the most oddball group of Satanists one ever did see. Robbie Amell still steals the show as Max, the shirt-hating psychopath with a fondness for Cole who'll compliment him even as he's trying to kill him. Pitch Perfect's Hana Mae Lee's Sonya is still fun as the most Satan-loving and hardcore members of the group. Sadly like the last film, she is underutilized. The two more comical members Allison (Bella Thorne) and John (Andrew Bachelor), who I felt were the weak links last time, are better written, especially John. 

Melanie (Emily Alyn Lind), Cole's love interest from the last film gets a lot more to do here. I loved Lind's performance and how her character is made more interesting. We also get some new faces who fit right in.

There is one really frustrating part of this film. Everyone thinks Cole made up the events from last time. I'm sorry, even if they couldn't find any bodies, there were still so many loose threads that this doesn't make any sense. Also, the high school scenes run too hard on "high school sucks" cliches. However, most of these issues are just in the introduction and quickly fade away.  

Overall, I recommend this. This was just a lot of crazy fun. (It does help to see the first one to understand what is going on.)