Saturday, August 29, 2020

Bill & Ted Face the Music

 

9/10

In this third, and from what I hear final, entry in the Bill and Ted trilogy, the titular protagonists still haven't written the song that'll unite the world and have spent the past couple decades unsuccessfully trying. They're informed that they're almost out of time and that not only is the world at stake, reality itself is. 

I ended up really, really liking this. It keeps the ol' Bill and Ted feel. Probably helps that this is written by the guys who did the first two films, Chris Matheson and Ed Solomon. What we get is another wacky, creative comedy that does whatever it wants to do concept-wise. It manages to incorporate major story elements from the last two films that serve as nostalgic homages without feeling like straight-up retreads. The continuity in this feels; there's one particular bit at the beginning harkening back to the previous films that feels like it was always meant to be. Matheson and Solomon manage to include all the important supporting characters, including Death (William Sadler).     

The movie constantly surprises you as to what happens next. I laughed out loud at this many times. Definitely one of the fresher written comedies I've seen in a while. This is a general audience-pleaser, neither too childish nor too mature.  

Of course, the main draws are still Bill (Alex Winter) and Ted (Keanu Reeves). They're humorous in their simpleness, but never played downright dumb like characters with predictable scenes where they don't understand basic concepts. Bill and Ted remain a couple of chill dudes you'd like to hang with. Them interacting goofily, but sincerely with themselves and most of the cast is one of the best parts of the film. One major difference from when they were teens, is that there is more of a earnestness with them which helps you get invested as they try to complete their mission. It's impressive how Winter hasn't dropped a beat playing Bill, especially since he hasn't been acting as much nowadays. (He's been directing recently.) Keanu isn't able to quite recapture his original performance, but Ted is kind of the slightly more mature of the duo in this and I think Keanu is able to make it work. 

Supporting cast is strong. Ready or Not's Brigitte Lundy-Paine and Samara Weaving do good jobs as Billie and Thea, Bill and Ted's daughters, who are basically modern-day variations of their fathers (similar, but not soooo similar that their characters feel superfluous). I did wish we spent a little more time with them as they don't get a lot of room to breathe. By the way, I have nothing but respect for whoever designed their clothes, quite eye-catching.

There are a few rather big plotholes. They're annoying, but it's not like this trilogy was known for it's deep writing. If you liked B&T so far, this probably won't be a dealbreaker for you. The movie also ends abruptly. Considering that a lot of this film is based around Bill and Ted's issues in their personal lives, you're kind of left wanting to know where their lives are headed. 

Also, Bill and Ted's wives and former princesses have been recast for a second time, this time played by Glee's Jayma Mays and Childrens Hospital's Erinn Hayes. Don't get me wrong, they're both good (though they don't get enough screentime), but it feels disrespectful to the previous actresses that they keep getting recast. (The original ones definitely weren't happy they weren't brought back for Bogus Journey.) Plus, it's a little uncomfortable that they hired actresses who are over ten years younger than the male actors they're playing against even though the characters are supposed to be all around the same age. Sort of an uncomfortable, female love interests aren't expected to look old situation.  

Overall, I highly recommend this. It' just a feel-good, fun film. Party on dudes.

Friday, August 28, 2020

New Mutants


8/10

New Mutants, based on the X-Men related comic book series, is about a group of teen mutants being held in a facility until they properly learn to control their powers. Suspicious events commence. This movie was supposed to come out in 2018 before Dark Phoenix and has been held back till now. (The switch to Disney from Fox probably was responsible for some of the stalling on how to handle this.) Now that it's finally come out I'm surprised at the delay. I mean, I could see the executives giving this little advertising or moving it to a weak box office month, but they didn't need to wait this long. Overall, I rather liked the movie.

This is one of the more unique takes on superheroes, being a combination of teen drama and horror. The strongest part is the characters, all managing to be distinct with a good cast playing them. 

The movie looks great. The film has this polished look to everything. It's greyness sets the bleak tone but isn't shot too darkly. The facility this movie mostly takes place in is appropriately creepy looking. It has this sterile, decrepit look while the building exteriors and grounds are pretty grand. The traditional big fight at the end is also definitely different from most films of this type by having some really unique visuals.

However, I can see other people not liking this as much as me. A lot of this movie is just people talking. It could've been shorter. In fact, the pacing may prevent me from watching this again soon.

It's a little hard to believe that the facility is run by only person. Given the powers and raw emotions of the teen mutants, you'd expect there'd be more people there in case things go awry or at least for basic building maintenance or  medical or technical support. Also, the character Ilyana's powers feel vaguely defined. 

I don't know if I can recommend this to everyone (especially if you're not a fan of teen drama, there is a lot of that in this.) However, director/co-writer Josh Boone (The Fault in Our Stars) had a clear distinct vision and I admire the effort.

Sunday, August 23, 2020

The Sleepover

6/10

This family film on Netflix is about siblings Clancy (played by Sadie Stanley) and Kevin (Maxwell Simkins) who find out that their mom (the Watchmen movie/Childrens Hospital's Malin Akerman) is an ex-thief who's been kidnapped along with their dad (Childrens Hospital's Ken Marino) and forced to do one last job. The children end up pursuing them with their friends. So basically, it's kind of the setup to Spy Kids 4-D with the execution of Adventures in Babysitting. (Just not as fantastic as the former and played safer than the latter.) I found this to be alright.

This is one of those films that doesn't do enough to separate itself from the pack. You can predict where a lot of things are going and the children have some really basic, worn-out personal storylines. The first act is particularly average cause you don't see anything new just the traditional children's movie family issues.

The Sleepover is generally entertaining, there are several good moments and lines throughout, but the quality isn't consistent. The strength in this is more in the little moments than the general storyline. 

I give the movie credit for not just predictably being about just the children's adventure. The parents' storyline is given just as much focus. However, it bugs me that the movie spends way too much time focusing on the dad being upset with his wife's secret and jealous of her ex-partner (Joe Manganiello). They never really convince you why the couple married or get you root for their relationship. I particularly think that Marino (who's a versatile actor and really should be in more stuff) was given a bad break as he does a good job of playing the character as he's supposed to be played but just isn't given the proper dialogue to work with.

The cast's good. The standout is probably Simkins as he does a great job of nailing the odd goofball. His character demanded the most stuff, and he was game for all of it. Though it's a small role, Erik Griffin lights up each scene as the mom's witness protection handler.

If the crime portion of this story got your hopes up: no, there isn't a lot of action. The budget for this appeared to be pretty low.

I know I've been hard on this film, but it does have it's charm. As something to park your kids in front of, I think they'd like it. It's just as an adult viewer there is nothing about this to make it must-see viewing.

Sunday, August 16, 2020

Magic Camp

8/10

Magic Camp is about Andy (Adam Devine) a once promising magician fallen on hard times who ends up as a counselor at his childhood magic camp. 

This movie was supposed to be released theatrically in 2018 but got pulled till now and put on Disney+. 'Course this is often a warning sing. Looking at previous cases: Noelle was weak and Artemis Fowl was a failure. I'm pleased to say this isn't the case here. It looks more like an issue of Disney just not being confident that this would be attractive enough to get butts in seats. The movie is very predictable, the traditional has-been or never-will who's forgotten their passion and becomes the mentor of a ragtag group of kids story. But, it's a competently told one, and I was entertained.        

This is a safely made movie. The plot doesn't take any big chances. Cinematography and sets and scenery are basic. (Not to say that the magic camp looks shabby. The place iss nice; it just won't leave an impression.) However, the dialogue has energy has energy and positivity. The movie doesn't skimp on the magic tricks featuring a healthy amount of pleasing props.   

The kid characters are all composed of tropes, such as the girl whose parents are always working and the boy whose father expects him to follow in his footsteps, but the actors are mostly pretty good. The one that stands out most is Isabelle Crovetti as Ruth, a girl who's unhealthily obsessed with and overworked about rabbits. The weak link is unfortunately the head kid Nathaniel McIntyre. He just isn't as strong an actor as the others.    

Devine makes for a good lead. Yeah, his character's more selfish moments can be weak and feel a little too reminiscent of his self-serving characters from such films as Final Girls and Mike and Dave Get Wedding Dates. However, the movie never leans too hard on this. Devine and his character really shine when they're acting off of others. Jeffrey Tambor does a great job as the head of the camp. (I'm appreciating the performance, not addressing the allegations against the actor in real life. This was filmed before or during when they came out.) He makes a fine wise eccentric, and the movie uses the character to poke some light jabs at the predictableness of the mentor trope.

Gillian Jacobs is Darkwood, Andy's successful former partner. She's a good actress and being a Community fan, I was pleased to see her in this. Unfortunately, she's pretty stale here. In fairness, the script and editing makes it look like the creators didn't quite know how to handle the character. There is also a bully in this played by Hayden Crawford. The character was the only painfully predictable element in this. He's just so basic, being the type who immediately goes after the main gang without any logical provocation or reason. He, being the character and not Crawford, who played as intended, adds nothing to this.  

This probably works best as one of those films for the family to watch. It doesn't break the mold, but it's a nice way to spend time.

Friday, August 14, 2020

Doom Patrol- Season 2

9/10

Season 2 continues the exploits of the Doom Patrol as they deal with more weird villains and personal issues as well as the unbridled power of new young member Dorothey Spinner (Abigail Shapiro). I continue to love this show!     

Doom Patrol continues to amaze, remaining one of the most creative shows currently out there. One of the things I like best about this is how the writers will make changes to the already out-there characters and ideas that always manage to knock it out of the park.  

Dorothy continues the show's history of sculpting tragic, multifaceted tragic characters. Though the show has stories for all the characters, her story is the main backstory. (I'm keeping things vague because it is an interesting tale.) Shapiro, who is actually twenty with  cleidocranial dysostosis allowing her to play younger, does a really good job playing as an eleven-year old. Unlike last season, we get Niles Caulder (Timothy Dalton) full time here. Dalton has always been a great actor, but this may be the performance of his career. Caulder is such a complex, fascinating character, and Dalton nails every emotion. The other Doom Patrol members and their actors remain strong. I still love Brendan Frasier as the voice of Robotman/Cliff Steele doing the perfect delivery for the character's comical and uncensored reactions to the sheer insanity going on around him. 

Despite my praise, I liked the first season a little better than this due to the characters arcs having some issues. The first season perfectly balanced the light and the dark. This season felt at times like it was trying a little too hard to put the characters through the emotional ringer. Don't get me wrong, there is some pretty good material. (The show still does a better job of juggling light and dark than Titans or Stargirl ever did.) However, I worry that the show may eventually go down the Once Upon a Time path and rely too much on flashbacks and having to invent more and more past trauma. Cliff and Larry's issues that weren't resolved and carried over from last season worked well. However, Rita's issues were wrapped up and her new doubts this season feel created in the name of having every character have drama. It doesn't help that Cliff is written a little too dumb sometimes and Rita (April Bowlby) too over-the-top comical.       

A couple things to bare in mind: COVID hit before the last episode was fully filmed, so expect a cliffhanger to what was supposed to be a self-contained story. Though villains are picked from throughout the comic's various run, emphasis is still put on the Morrison years. If you were waiting to see any of the Doom Patrol's five-or-so quirky major rogues from its original run, you'll still be disappointed. 

The show is still a great visual feat, though I think the budget was cut a little so don't expect exactly the quality of last season. (The main threat looks like it could've been more polished.) I'm still impressed how they manage to visually adapt some of the fantastic characters from the comics. They actually chose to tackle the helmet of Dr. Tyme, one of the goofiest and weirdest appearances in comic book history, and got it to work.  

Overall, I really, really, really recommend this. My criticisms were in comparison to the first season. It's still more original and better written than most of the shows out there. 

Thursday, August 13, 2020

Stargirl- Season 1

6/10

Stargirl, on DCUniverse and the CW, is about teen Courtney Whitmore (played Brec Bassinger) who finds out her new stepfather Pat Dugan (Luke Wilson) used to be the sidekick to superhero Starman (Joel McHale). She ends up becoming the new owner of the hero's Cosmic Staff. The show really fluctuates from pretty darn good to painfully frustrating.

I'll go with the pros first. Stargirl is an homage to silver age comics, often evoking a sort of modern retro feel. The writers are willing to go a little more high concept out there than other superhero fare. The show is jampacked with Justice Society and Injustice Society members providing a wide range of distinct characters. Heck, they even include the Gambler (Eric Goins), probably one of the least used ISA villains in comics and media these days. 

The cast is all good. Bassinger does a convincing job with the character's optimism and earnestness. Though the best one in this is Wilson. His Pat is completely believable as someone who would've been a 40's-style sidekick with an "awe-shucks" kindness and desire to do the right thing.  

The budget isn't shabby, featuring some pretty good fights and CGI creations. (Though it seems to go only so far, and there is a fair amount of talking in the middle.) The Americana-style town this takes place in looks pretty good.

Now for the problems. The superhero stuff is really good, but the teen drama parts are sooooo cookie-cutter and basic. I mean really, really basic; one of the most uninspiring I've ever seen. The teen dialogue sounds very "TV" and not natural at all. Including the worse "mean girl" dialogue I've ever heard. Also, this mines parent-issue tropes way, way too much. It's depressing and frequently too obvious. I mean why are bad parents all the rage these days. I mean if you had lousy ones, I understand it is nice knowing your not alone in the world, but there is just so much of this these days. It feels like a crutch now. The tone in general can be pretty bipolar.

Although I liked Stargirl in this, there are several moments, where she can be maddeningly thickheaded, especially one dogged assumption she makes based on very little evidence. I mean she's a teen, and teens do dumb things, but as mentioned the dialogue doesn't feel natural in the slightest. The villains also do some stuff that cross the line between practical evil and forced evil-for-the-sake-of-evil.

The worse stuff happens in the middle. the beginning and end are pretty darn good.  

This is hard decide to recommend or not. I rotated between loving and hating Stargirl. I will still be watching, because I hope to see more of the good stuff and there's the hope for improvement.

Wednesday, August 12, 2020

The Alienist: Angel of Darkness (Season 2)

9/10

This second season of The Alienist, which feels more like a sequel and is based on the book sequel Angel of Darkness. Psychiatrist Laszlo Kreizler (played by Daniel Brühl), John Moore (Luke Evans), now a reporter, and Sara Howard (Dakota Fanning), now a private detective, reunite to hunt down a baby killer. I think I liked this more than the first.

The length was cut down from ten episodes to eight and I think that really helped with the pacing. Subplots and the mystery don't feel dragged out like last time did a little. 

Brühl, Evans, and Fanning remain a powerhouse acting triumvirate. The personal subplot of Kreizler, whose storyline last season was wrapped up, feels undercooked. Moore and Howard, whose romantic tension carries over from last season, have a lot more to work with.

The character of former police commissioner Thomas Byrnes is greatly improved here. Ted Levine gave a good performance last time, don't get me wrong, but the character felt a little thin. Here, he's given more to do and is written more nuanced. You understand him more and he's an interesting morally ambiguous character. One of his highpoints this season is his many behind-the-scenes scheming sessions with William Randolph Hearst (Matt Letscher), which is one of the best additions this season.

The antagonist here is more interesting than last time.

The show continues to do a great job working with the historical setting, including the topics of Hearst's yellow journalism and the climate just before the beginning of the Spanish-American War. Visually, the show's depiction of 19th century New York still looks really, really good, especially considering this is for cable television. My hats off to whoever designed Fanning's outfits. They are all so unique and expertly compliment the character and the actress' distinct features.

Be forewarned that like last season, this show goes DARK. Although, I'm pleased that this season didn't feel like it crossed the line and pushed things too hard like they did with that one scene with Moore last time.

I did feel that there were too many "blatantly uncaring establishment" characters shoved in the audience's face. Also, there is an element in the show that is big at first but suddenly feels completely and unsatisfactorily abandoned by the end. 

Overall, if you liked or kind of liked the last one, I recommend this slicker version.